Providing You with the Clinical Support You Need to Motivate Change & Improve Safety
Motivating facilities to address putting protective controls for toilet plume aerosols in place requires the support of clinical evidence. Especially since neither the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard, nor USP 800 specifically address requirements for employee protection for toilet plume aerosols, it is important that we let experience and the scientific literature guide us to safer practices and better environments.
 
			 
			Over the years, dozens of papers and clinical guidelines have been published characterizing occupational and environmental risks of aeration and contamination of bloodborne and infectious disease and hazardous chemicals like chemotherapy drugs.
More than 25% of post-flush cultures test positive for infectious microorganisms that can cause healthcare associated infections to patients, personnel, or visitors, including Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, and C. difficile.
Clinical Findings
Research and Publications
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene
Oncology Nurses Survey
Relevant Research Publications
 
			Quick Links
Contact SPLASHBLOCKER®
1-800-956-8807
info@splashblocker.com
To protect caregivers, the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) recommends flushing the toilet with the lid down, especially 48-to-72 hours after a patient receives chemotherapy. Since most hospitals do not have protective lids, ONS recommends wearing personal protective equipment such as gloves, chemotherapy gowns, respiratory masks, and face shields. ONS further recommends that nurses apply a plastic-backed chuck pad over the toilet before flushing. However, this action presents concerns about handling safety, disposal and landfill costs, chucks not readily available, and routine noncompliance.
When interviewed in a published survey, nurse managers cited several reasons for caregivers' noncompliance with personal protective equipment use when disposing human waste including, but not limited to, urgent patient situations, nurses too busy or rushed, and precautions being "too extreme". In fact, according to EPINet occupational mucocutaenous exposure incident data, when an employee has an exposure, 62% of all exposures were to the eyes, nose, and mouth, and less than 16% were wearing any kind of face protection (e.g., protective eye wear, faceshield, surgical mask).
With this situation in mind, how can nurses and caregivers readily protect themselves from the adverse health effects of disposing chemotherapeutically-tainted human waste as well as help hospitals and health care settings in mitigating the spread of infectious diseases? The early reviews by nurses and other healthcare workers of the SplashblockerA® indicate that the SPLASHBLOCKER® may provide a solution to enhance their protection. Improving environmental sustainability and providing cost savings for the hospital by significantly reducing the utilization of "blue chucks" are additional benefits of utilizing the SPLASHBLOCKER® over current practices.
"Covered by US D782,635 and related foreign design registrations with utility patents pending."
Copyright © 2025. All rights reserved. Covered by US D782,635 and related foreign design registrations and utility patents pending
